In his
School of Beauty, School of Culture (2012, currently on view in
Kerry James Marshall: The Histories at Musée d’Art Moderne de Paris until January 24, 2027), the figures are silhouetted against a raucous color palette of apple green walls, a tangerine floor, and heart-shaped mirrors outlined in gold filigree. And in the reflection of an upstage full-length mirror, there’s the flash of a camera. There are pictures within pictures within pictures. Black women primp and delight in their own image. They’re dolled up in formfitting striped trousers, cleavage-bearing shirts, vivid jackets, and heels that are made for posing rather than walking.
Everyone seems to be in some stage of joyful preparation, readying themselves for the public square. But for a time, in the intimate space of Mr. Marshall’s salon, they’re reveling in their own beauty—and their culture—without judgment or disclaimers. I appreciate his confidence, his determination, that his subject’s humanity requires no explanation. His kin will know what it means to fellowship at the beauty parlor. And those who don’t should be honored to have been offered a glimpse of the joy.
Just as Mr. Marshall has a rigorous understanding of his discipline, Mr. Yamamoto is well-versed in fashion history, particularly the Western canon that has guided designers for centuries. His knowledge of Christian Dior’s Bar jacket has allowed him to deconstruct it. His familiarity with bespoke suiting helped guide him down a path toward silhouettes that are loose and free, but not shapeless. He is a rebel and a rogue who tells colorful tales in shades of black.
“Black is modest and arrogant at the same time,” Mr. Yamamoto once
said. “Black can swallow light, or make things look sharp. But above all black says this: ‘I don’t bother you—don't bother me!’” He was talking about fashion, of course, but I love the way his assessment of black captures both an aesthetic and an attitude. For Mr. Yamamoto, black was not mournful or sad. It was powerful and audacious. He was not subordinate to the long-standing ideas about what was desirable, valuable, or appropriate. When Mr. Yamamoto debuted as a designer in Paris in 1981, he came with his own history in fashion—a dedication passed along by his dressmaker mother and technical skills refined at Bunka Fashion College. If he was an outsider, it was only because someone else had determined precisely where the boundaries lay.
He arrived in the era of high ostentation, a time when the goal of committed capitalists was to make sure that those who gazed upon them, did so with awe and envy.
Being rich might have been the ultimate end they were all chasing, but being the center of the public’s attention—by
looking very, very rich—made success that much more satisfying. The fashion industry was more than happy to accommodate that dynamic.
Mr. Yamamoto’s debut collection subverted all the assumptions about wealth and femininity. Instead of crafting clothes that placed a multitude of demands on a woman’s body—a slender waist, delicately rounded hips, long legs—he created clothes that simply allowed her body to exist, comfortably, clearly, and unbothered. Although some editors and retailers found his sensibility dour or nihilistic, many more were entranced. In the earliest days of his arrival in Paris, people recognized that fashion had shifted. Black was not oppressive. It was liberating.
Black allows shapes and silhouettes to shine. It nods to his preference for giving women the sobriety and strength embedded in menswear. It evokes his interest in punks and in the dignity and tenacity of his widowed mother. In choosing black, he offered an alternative to the way so many people always presumed fashion and femininity had to be conceived. He was “showing the way to a whole new way of beauty,”
Vogue editor Polly Mellen
said at the time. “It shows us a whole new wave of dressing… It is modern and free. It has given my eyes something new.” Mr. Yamamoto uses black—and flashes of cherry red and ivory—with a sense of knowing delight, as if he has a delicious secret that he is eager to share, as if he has discovered a hidden portal to a better existence.
He demonstrates that black doesn’t have to evoke sorrow or grief. It doesn’t have to be a version of camouflage that allows the wearer to blend into the scenery. In Mr. Yamamoto’s hands, black is tactile, embellished, rigorous, sensual, silly, powerful. Contrary to the trope of the little black dress that’s endlessly versatile and fits in everywhere, black doesn’t have to be “easy” or accommodating. Mr. Yamamoto’s version of black isn’t a form of elegant refusal. As with Mr. Marshall, black is a vociferous expression of delight in oneself. It declares one present.
When I think of all the collections that Mr. Yamamoto has presented on the Paris runway, like so many people, I recall his spring 1999 women’s show.